December 04, 2012 journal, God sees ever act of kindness in the world as he does all evil. The nation stopped at the site of a New York policeman down on his knees putting shoes and socks on an old homeless man and it turns out that he had purchased these new with his own money. The nation's greedy grotesque foreclosure banks all sure need to see this. Control your mind to think godly thoughts in resisting Satan's temptation to think on evil. Hurry to worship the God and seek his face to draw closer to him to avoid death and fire. The T R DR Torpedo accused by women may be safer in jail than on the streets when husbands find out how he has been treating them. I pictured him as a red faced high blood pressure with an obese nurse wife who died unfortunately. A lawyer said that is a perfect representation of his practice of suing doctors for medical malpractice. We have the priest pedophilers and the sweet weirdo perverts along with the oversexed professionals to deal with in a land of chaos where there is no distinction any longer between right and wrong. The latest round of charges against the TR DR accused him of patient assault and battery. Ask any preacher where in the Bible does it mention the Star of David and they will not know. You get that blind deer stare from a brain-dead individual that uses his head only as a hat rack. The answer of course is that the Star of David is a pagan symbol of the Zionist false Russian Khazar Israeli that never lived in Palestine prior to raping it in 1948. Modern Israel was formed by the same Russian Jewish converts to Babylonian Judaism as produced the Bolsheviks Lenin revolution took over Russia killing all the Christians. Pat Robertson pretends to not know any history of the false Israeli takeover of Palestine by the Russian Khazars leading up to the 1948 handover of Jerusalem to the Communist. May it be clear in everyone's mind that the Zionist are not the House of Israel Israelites. The Zionists were converted to a weird brand of Judaism with the Talmud as their Bible in 743 A D from southern Russia and were notorious warriors against Islamic aggression. They numbered about 12 million compared to only 500,000 Orthodox Jewish people that study and worship by the Torah rather than the Talmud Babylonian mythology. They then pressured and conned the Bistish, USA and the United Nations in giving them Palestine. Star of David is Red not blue as they show it and this is where the word red got to Russia. Biblically the color red represents blood or war as in the red horse and it is no different in a godless nation of people although we cannot blame the regular Russian people because it is the act of Zionism that brought communism and the Iron Curtain to Russia & China. This article says Christian people are supporting their own enemy and that Christianity will be extinct in just a few years at the rate we are going today in outlawing God. But Santa Claus has taken his place, that is good enough for the Christian Church apparently. Highlights of Gog and Magog article-"For a non-Jew, such as this writer, to quote him & use his work to such an extent, incorporating it so as to illustrate that biblical prophecies concerning the evils of Gog and Magog clearly point to the Talmudic Khazarians, risks the accusation of anti-Semitism. Such a response, however, should have been clearly shown to be vacuous at best, considering the proofs herein presented that those Jews who hold political rule over Palestine are not even remotely descended from Semitic tribes. One cannot, however, help but stand in awe at the consummate ability of these peoples who, comprising from one to six per cent of the average population of countries outside of Israel, have managed to acquire positions of power and influence far exceeding their representation in the general populace of those nations. The rhetoric "There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to help them support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we are Jews." But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." The history of the Russian Khazars Zionist is finally out of the bag and is falling into the hands of their victim's as God wills it. The days of these brutal people are now numbered. The unenlightened Christian Church has been very foolish to see them through the money. The Russian Khazar people are the Zionist & they spoke the Yiddish language early on." I have seen the Antichrist and he is Antichrist but he is not Moslem, he is praised by all. False prophet Jack Van Impe said on Christian TV December 1st that Gog and Magog would be destroyed and he is right of course on that one single statement but he is dead wrong on identifying who is Gog and Magog. It is not the Moslems. It is clearly those imposture Russian Israelis falsely claiming to be God's favorite people when they are not according to the Bible New Testament Book of Revelation Chapters 2 and 3. Please read this important account in history in the link below identifying Scripture of Gog & Magog. Charles Stanley preaching December 2 said many people sit in church thinking they are saved when they are not saved. I have waited for a life time to hear that said. It is true. Salvation is by faith and not by any works good or evil, never limit God as to his blessing. The physical cliff is phony continuing the Republican rhetoric while knowing the Federal Reserve can print 20 trillion dollars and give it mostly all to European banks without our knowledge. Did you feel it in your pocketbook when that happened. No but you will. We only learned of this from a limited audit of the Federal Reserve ordered by Congress. This is 30% more money than the official catastrophic and record-breaking national debt. This is the Antichrist new age new world order of Christian killers fresh out of Karl Marx Communist Russia. This is our banking system and owners of the phony Federal Reserve. America may never flush out the enemy prior to God's final end of this His day of grace. When you have a witness for the Antichrist such as the CBN 700 Club supporting those Republican guardians of the rich the future does not look very bright for this dark world. One may get the impression honestly that God is Republican and that all Democrats are sinners. I can assure you that God is not Republican or Democrat and not even American. God is not a Mason so do not keep your secrets for him because he is not a secret God. America can go on forever printing money that the foreign Federal Reserve authorizes but God will destroy the Beast as its primary dwelling place is in American money monopoly. Why the Fiscal Cliff Is a Scam "The fiscal cliff is a scam-so says Professor James K. Galbraith. And he's written an article which goes through the six reasons he thinks it is such a scam. And we're going to start, as we speak, a six-part series where we go through each of his reasons. And he now joins us. Professor James K. Galbraith teaches at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin. He's the author of The Predator State, and the latest among his many publications is Inequality and Instability: A Study of the World Economy Just Before the Great Crisis. Thanks for joining us, James. James K. Galbraith, LBJ School of Public Affairs, UT Austin: My pleasure, as always. Jay: So just before we start with reason number one, just give us sort of the overall headline why you think the fiscal cliff is a scam. Certainly the media is stampeding us with fear about what's going to happen. Galbraith: Well, what I wrote was that it is a crisis that was contrived a year ago as a deal, part of the deal to permit lifting of the debt ceiling. And these deadlines which were set up for the end of this year were established so as to create a climate of crisis in the period after the election, when things could be done that would no longer be immediately subject to the kind of public debate that you get before the election. And so we're now in this period. It was clear from election day that a massive wave of public relations was being brought to bear on this. You can read the op-eds that appeared in The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times on election day on that point. And now we're in the middle of it. And the claim being made is that if there isn't a decision taken by the end of this year-which effectively means, really, in the next three weeks or so-that very bad things will happen to the economy. And, of course, it isn't true. The reality is that while there will be changes that-in tax rates, for example, that will take effect on January 1, the impact of those changes on economic activity will be very slow, very gradual. And the Congress coming in in January will have plenty of opportunity to mitigate, eliminate those effects if it chooses to do that. And it can set the whole business back retroactively to the first of the year. So if there isn't a-if the crisis, so-called crisis simply passes with no legislative action this year, nothing very serious will happen that can't be fixed in the first six weeks or so of next year. Jay: Now, you've written that the computer modeling that is being presented to us isn't correct. We're being told that this is tremendously recessionary and/or doesn't deal properly with the debt. And we saw an interview with the head of Goldman Sachs on 60 Minutes, who says the fact that all this has-the economy has such a question mark over it is paralyzing investment. You don't buy this. Galbraith: The notion that this is being-that the condition of the economy has been driven by uncertainty that can somehow be resolved by an act of Congress in the next three weeks is, of course, the last refuge of a very first-class scoundrel. What's true here is that if you allowed major increases in tax rates on the middle class and on working people, because the payroll tax holiday will expire at the beginning of the year, if you allow all of that to continue to bite for six months or a year, then it would begin to squeeze people's consumption and you would have a significant effect on total demand by the end of the year. And that's what the Congressional Budget Office said, and I think it's a fair point. But there is absolutely no reason to believe that you need to act by December 21 in order to avoid that effect. If you acted by January 31 or February 15, you would mitigate that effect in plenty of time. Jay: So the point you're making is this doesn't have to be done in the midst of crisis and hysterical mentality. Galbraith: Right, and there is a reason-there are two reasons why the pressure is on to do it in an atmosphere of crisis. Reason number one is that the Congress will be significantly more Democratic next year than it is this year. The Senate will have two extra Democratic votes, and the composition of that majority will be significantly different and substantially more progressive in important ways. And secondly, there is clearly a desire to put into law now, in this Congress, long-term changes in Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. That was the agenda of the people who designed the fiscal cliff: okay, well, we'll set up a crisis, and at the end of 2012 we'll come in with these changes. And that might be, for example, curtailing the cost-of-living adjustments in Social Security, raising the age of eligibility for Medicare, any number of things which in effect would cut benefits, or, in the case of what I just said about Medicare, basically a partial privatization, forcing people to rely on private insurance for a couple of extra years. So that's what was being held in reserve for the post-election period. And the danger remains is that at the end of this Congress we'll have in the last few days some concession on the Republican side on the tax issues, and the Democratic leadership will come in and say, and specifically the White House will come in and say, well, now we've got what we want on taxes; we need to make a concession on Medicare and Medicaid. I think Social Security's been taken off the table for the moment. We may have won that battle. But I'm still concerned that what may happen to our very important health insurance programs, totally unnecessarily, will be kind of folded in as a kind of necessary concession at the end [crosstalk] Jay: Well, we're going to talk more about this part in part two of this series of interviews. But in the article you wrote, you talk about the CBO revising its own forecasts. And what was that about? Galbraith: That has to do with these longer-term deficit forecasts, which have been part of the climate of preoccupation with the deficit, the national debt, all along. And one of the ironies of the situation we're in now is that the fiscal cliff is actually a reduction in deficits, and the same people who were telling us that we need to be frightened about the long-term deficit are telling us that we need to be frightened about too small a short-term deficit [incompr.] could easily understand why for the larger public this is just a tiny bit confusing. But those long-term CBO forecasts of very rapidly rising national debt, very rapidly rising deficits, rest on a couple of very doubtful assumptions. One is that health-care costs will continue to rise more rapidly than every other cost in the economy forever-can't happen and won't happen, but that's-you can build a computer forecast that makes it happen, in which it happens. And the other is that the interest rate that the federal government pays on its public debt will be raised by the Federal Reserve, let's say, four years from now, to a point where it's higher than the growth rate of total output, the growth rate of income, and then that interest burden compounds, the interest payments compound as a share of GDP and go up very rapidly after that. If you stretch out that forecast long enough, you can get a debt-to-GDP ratio as high as you like in a computer projection. But once again, it will not happen in real life. It's not consistent with the way an actual economy is going to function. Jay: So, again, an artificial sense of urgency being created. Galbraith: An artificial sense of urgency about events that are 30 or 40 years off. It's a very strange situation. And we have obvious pressing problems-unemployment, foreclosures, energy, climate change. We have clear things that should be at the top of our priorities. And instead you have this preoccupation, obsessive preoccupation with computer projections which are easily-let's say, easily rebutted and which in any event, you know, are making statements about events that are highly conjectural and very far in the future. Jay: Okay. In part two of this series of interviews, we're going to ask: is there a looming crisis with Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid? So please join us for part two of our interview with James Galbraith on The Real News Network." Paul Jay, The Real News Network: Is there a looming crisis of debt or deficits such that sacrifices in general are n News Report: Iceland's commitment to its program, a decision to push losses on to bondholders instead of taxpayers and the safeguarding of a welfare system that shielded the unemployed from penury helped propel the nation from collapse toward recovery, according to the Washington-based fund. The rebound continues to wow officials, including International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde, who recently referred to the Icelandic recovery as "impressive".